tree octopus real or fake? Better reviews and complaints

tree octopus real or fake? Better reviews and complaints
tree octopus real or fake? Better reviews and complaints

The Elusive Tree Octopus: A Cryptid or Clever Hoax?


For over a decade, the internet has been abuzz with claims of a remarkable creature known as the “tree octopus.” This alleged cephalopod species is said to inhabit the treetops along the Olympic Peninsula coast of Washington state. But is the tree octopus a genuine cryptid awaiting discovery, or is it an intricately woven web of internet deception? In this comprehensive analysis, we’ll delve into the world of the tree octopus, examining the evidence, origins, and credibility of this curious creature.

The Origins of the Tree Octopus

The first known reference to the tree octopus surfaced in 1998 on a website associated with the “International Society of Arboriculture” (ISA). This website presented a series of detailed reports and rather low-quality photos showcasing the existence of these tree-dwelling octopuses. The narrative described their remarkable color-changing abilities that allowed them to blend seamlessly into the tree branches, along with their suckers, which enabled them to climb with ease. Features such as prehensile tentacles, small size tailored to their habitat, and nocturnal behavior were all presented as adaptations that allowed them to thrive in the treetops.

At first glance, this story seemed to suggest a plausible new species inhabiting the Northwest’s lush forests, albeit a rather niche discovery. However, as with many internet hoaxes, a series of questions and doubts began to surface. Most notably, if these creatures had indeed been discovered over a decade ago, why had there been no published scientific papers or mainstream acknowledgment beyond this single website? The forestry departments and wildlife experts in the region remained strangely silent about such a momentous ecological discovery in their own backyard. Skeptics started raising red flags.

Lack of Credible Scientific Evidence

Upon closer examination, it became evident that there was a distinct absence of credible scientific evidence to support the claims of the tree octopus. Despite being introduced to the world in the late ’90s, there were no peer-reviewed studies, distribution maps, or comprehensive population surveys documenting the existence of this purported new species. The scientific community, renowned for its rigorous scrutiny and skepticism, had not embraced the idea of a tree-dwelling octopus.

ISA’s Admission

An important piece of the puzzle was the ISA website’s admission that the tree octopus page had been created in 1996 as an exercise in imaginative fiction by a student named Nathan Wrasse. The website even went so far as to caution that any animal attributed to their organization should be considered fictional unless credible independent third-party sources could corroborate it. In the case of the tree octopus, no such independent verification existed.

Impossibly Specialized Anatomy and Behavior

The tree octopus, as described in the narrative, exhibited anatomical adaptations so precisely tailored to its arboreal lifestyle that they raised suspicions. While some octopuses do possess prehensile limbs and camouflage abilities, the tree octopus seemed to have taken the concept of specialization to an extreme level, suspiciously aligning with the claims made about its habitat and behavior. These adaptations appeared too conveniently designed to validate the imaginative narrative rather than reflecting the kind of chance variations typical in natural adaptations.

Conclusion: Fiction Over Fact

In summary, when subjected to critical scrutiny, the tree octopus narrative unravels. It lacks the essential elements that would substantiate the existence of a new species, such as credible scientific research, peer-reviewed findings, or verifiable specimens. Instead, it seems to be a product of imaginative storytelling rather than a genuine cryptozoological discovery.

While the tree octopus may have entertained and intrigued many as an internet prank, it remains firmly in the realm of fiction. Objective analysis, backed by a lack of credible evidence and the dubious origins of the story, suggests that the tree octopus is more of a clever hoax than a legitimate cryptid. Its enduring legacy is as a whimsical and amusing creation of the internet age.


The phenomenon known as the “tree octopus” has intrigued internet users for over a decade. This purported creature is said to be a unique species of octopus that inhabits the treetops along the Olympic Peninsula coast of Washington state. However, a closer examination of the evidence surrounding the tree octopus reveals a curious tale of imaginative fiction rather than scientific fact.

The story of the tree octopus first emerged in 1998 on a website associated with the “International Society of Arboriculture” (ISA). Detailed reports and low-quality photos on this site depicted the tree-dwelling octopuses with remarkable attributes, such as color-changing abilities for camouflage and suckers enabling them to climb trees with ease. These features, along with claims of prehensile tentacles, small size, and nocturnal behavior, painted a picture of a creature uniquely adapted to life in the treetops.

However, skepticism soon arose as questions were raised about the absence of mainstream scientific acknowledgment and the lack of published research beyond this single website. Furthermore, the ISA website itself admitted that the tree octopus page was created in 1996 as a work of imaginative fiction.

A crucial factor contributing to doubts about the tree octopus’s existence was the absence of credible scientific evidence. No peer-reviewed studies, distribution maps, or population surveys supported its existence. The scientific community had not embraced this supposed discovery.

Anomalies in the tree octopus’s anatomy and behavior also raised suspicions. Its adaptations appeared suspiciously tailored to fit the narrative rather than reflecting natural evolutionary processes. These factors suggested that the tree octopus was more a product of creative storytelling than a legitimate cryptozoological find.

In conclusion, the tree octopus, while entertaining as internet lore, lacks the essential elements that substantiate the existence of a new species. It is more likely a clever hoax than a genuine cryptid. Objective analysis, combined with the dubious origins of the story and the absence of credible scientific evidence, supports the view that the tree octopus is a work of fiction rather than a scientific reality. Its legacy endures as a whimsical creation of the digital age, reminding us of the power of imaginative storytelling on the internet.

Read similar post below :

legit norway rmt comes over after date night full 2023

Is milwaukee trials legit or scam? Better reviews and compliant 2023

corrib capital management scam | better review and complaint

Is my success wave real or fake? Better analysis 2023

raffles champagne truffle mooncake better review/analysis 2023

tree octopus

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.